Tag Archive | "Palin"

A Day Frozen in Time, A Nation Thrust Towards the Future

Tags: , , , ,

A Day Frozen in Time, A Nation Thrust Towards the Future


A Day Frozen in Time, A Nation Thrust Towards the Future

By Max Godnick

I go to a school with six hundred well to do New Yorkers. My peers, and most members of my generation, have been long stricken with a case of apathy.  I never thought that in my adolescence, I would see my generation brought together over politics and history.

Yesterday changed all that. Throughout the day, I could tell I was living out the pages of my grandchildren’s textbooks. Something was different. There was an undeniable energy in the air. People knew something was coming. While they may not have watched the primaries, followed the veepstakes, or seen the debates, they realized that their country was on the brink of a new era; a true turning point in a sometimes negative and drawn out history.

At eleven o’clock, time stopped. Horns honked, pots and pans were smashed, and fireworks were set off. A catharsis was about to begin. I looked outside my window and saw a scene straight out of a movie. People were cheering, strangers were jumping amongst one another, they were chanting, they were elated; they recognized that the world was changing, and they would be at the center of it.

Granted, I live in New York City in a largely African American neighborhood. I bet the scene in rural Idaho looked a lot different. But it did not matter. The country came together for the first time since September 11th,  yet this time, it was in joy and elation rather than tragedy and despair.

Who knows whether Barack Obama will be a successful president. Many questions are still left to be answered. But the world will turn their heads towards America, and look to us in a positive light. Respect, dignity, and awe will grace the ground of the United States. Americans will become truly engaged in politics again. As Obama builds his candidacy, the nation will watch, rooting, or not rooting, for a new day in American politics and culture.

I do not think I will ever see a time like this one ever again in my lifetime. My generation, the “purple youth”, has engaged in its country and culture like I never expected it could. My city can finally unite, shedding racial barriers that have stood strong for hundreds of years, and my country can look towards the future and to a new path.

Politics really do not play such a large role in what happened yesterday and what will happen in the days and years to come. Sure, it is based around the political process, but it is more than that. It is a general consensus that “now” matters. Now is our chance and we must grasp it. Absorb the moment. This is a rare opportunity, that wont be felt again for many years to come.

 

Posted in Election 2008, OpinionComments (2)

Counties Counties Counties

Tags: , , , ,

Counties Counties Counties


Counties Counties Counties

Okay, so votes are beginning to trickle in. But lets remember, when it says 1% of precincts reporting…that means that about one district is reporting votes.

So lets look at some of these early states

Indiana: this is looking a lot closer than I had expected. While Mccain holds about a 4% lead now, Obama is running extremely competitive given that some of his strongest counties have not reported any votes yet. Lake County, which houses the African American stronghold of Gary, has not reported anything yet. Once Gary begins to come in, look for this to tighten up significantly.

Virginia: Mccainites, dont get excited. I know there is a 15% lead in Virginia right now, but the only counties that have reported are primarily in the southern region. Obama holds great strength in Northern and Eastern Virginia. Lots of money and attention were put in to Prince Edward county, keep an eye out for that.

We dont have much info on Ohio, but word is that Obama is leading.

The opposite is true for West Virginia, Mccain is leading.

Florida is not realistic right now. Obama holds a huge lead, but only about one county is in.

I’m still going to stick with my projections, but I am very intrigued by Indiana. Obama is over performing.

Be back soon.


Max

Posted in Election 2008Comments (1)

Max Godnick’s Election Projections

Tags: , , , , ,

Max Godnick’s Election Projections


Boy did I choose a good year to become a political junkie. I pity the budding pundits who came before me, those who were in my position in 2004, 1996, or 1976. Sure all elections are influential, but this one, this was something else. First black credible candidate, first woman credible candidate, a primary season that treated each state like it was the deciding factor, a come from behind primary victory for Mccain, a heated veepstakes ending with one of the most talked about vice presidential picks…ever?

And now, after 100 primaries (plus guam, puerto rico, and american samoa), 2 conventions, and 3 debates, I am forced to make my projections of what will happen tomorrow night.

I am by no means in the minority by believing Barack Obama will win. His ground game is too good, his fundraising too high, and his lead in the crucial swing state polls are too great, for John Mccain to squeak out the 270 needed electoral votes.

According to RealClearPolitics, with one day left to go, the swing states are

MT, AZ, ND, MO, CO, FL, GA, NC, VA, IN, NH, NV, and OH

Obama leads by five points or more in CO, VA, and NV He holds smaller leads in FL and OH.

The good news for Obama is that if he can hold on to PA, he only needs to win one of those states to win.

So how big will his win be?

Obama/Biden 291 McCain/Palin 247

Obama/Biden 291 McCain/Palin 247

(Click on State or Table Below for Latest Polls and to Change Status)

Note that for some reason Florida is blue. I do not think Obama will win florida.
In this scenario, Obama’s win is substantial, but not the landslide some people were hoping for. In this scenario, a considerably amount of undecideds would have to break for Mccain, allowing him to win in Ohio, Missouri, and Florida. Still, new voters and a strong turnout gives Obama Colorado and Virginia.
Whatever happens tomorrow, this has been the most exciting year of my life. Thanks to all who participated in this years campaigns for opening my eyes to the political world.

Posted in Election 2008, OpinionComments (1)

Joe the Who?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Joe the Who?


Joe the Who?

Jon Goldsmith

Joe the \

With the election a few days away now one can only wonder how Joe the Plumber, or Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher, will impact the race. Let’s just set the record straight before we talk about his possible impacts.


Some Fact checks:

Rumor: Joe the Plumber stated that he was making between $250,000 and $280,000 a year.

Verdict: According to MSNBC, Court records show that Joe made $40,000 in 2006.

Rumor: Joe is a “Plumber”

Verdict: According to the Associated Press, Wurzelbacher does not have a plumber’s license or apprenticeship.

Rumor: Joe believes that US citizens will be taxed without representation under Obama’s plan, supporting his claim by saying “the last time that happened a couple of guys got together and threw the Brits out.”

Verdict: True. Joe said this during an October interview with NBC Kare 11

Rumor: There is a judgement lien against Joe for failure to pay $1,182 of his Ohio state income taxes

Verdict: True, according to ABC News.

Rumor: Joe is not registered to vote in Ohio for the election

Verdict: True according to Time Magazine

Now on to the impacts. No one can deny that the recent uproar of Joe the Plumber has caused a small increase in McCain’s polling numbers and the energy of his campaign. More important than why, is how is he having such an effect? It’s startling. This man is a walking hypocrisy. Joe the Plumber is not even a Plumber! Joe doesn’t make more than $40,000 and wouldn’t even be affected by Obama’s tax plan, rendering his qualms completely void. Joe can’t even pay his taxes now, which begs the question, “couldn’t Joe use Obama’s tax cut?” Now on to his pathetic attempt at a historical quip. The founding fathers declared that “taxation without representation” was against their natural rights. Let’s break down “taxation without representation” because I think Joe is a little lost here. The founding fathers complaint, largely spearheaded by Ben Franklin, declared that the colonists were being taxed without any representation in British Parliament. Does Joe not have a Congressmen? A Senator? A right to vote? Right to referendum and recall? Joe if you don’t have any of those things, then yes, you are being taxed without representation. You do, however, and let us hope the voters are smart enough to know the difference between a cheap political quip and accurate historical fact.


I don’t think anyone can deny, however, that Joe is making an impact in this race. “Joe the construction workers” and “Joe the bricklayers” have been showing up at McCain-Palin rallies across the country and he has truly energized the working-class base of the Republican party.


Joe has recently declared in another false diatribe that Senator Obama is a socialist because he wants to “spread the wealth around.” Yes, Senator Obama did say such remarks, but they are not socialist. Obama is referring to the graduated-progressive income tax instituted by none other than Theodore Roosevelt, McCain’s “biggest hero.” It’s not socialism to believe that tax breaks for the lower classes will encourage people to spend more money and create more jobs. If the working classes have more money, they can buy the produced goods of the factories they work in; they can buy new cars, groceries, and supplies which guarantees a stimulation of the economy.


Trickle down on the other hand, puts all the wealth in the hands of the richest 1%, believing that with the extra money, the rich will expand their businesses and hire more people to stimulate the economy. The major problem with “trickle-down” is that it doesn’t trickle down enough. Not many of the richest 1% own businesses anymore. The largest growing “1% professions” are just that–professional! Doctors and lawyers make up a vast majority of that 1% and have no business to expand, or jobs to give out. All that they do with their tax cut is buy luxury items, which are more expensive and employ less people to produce.


Believing in tax cuts for the working class is not socialist, its intelligent. Reaganomic tax cuts have been around since the late 80′s with the same result–depressed prosperity. Under the Clinton administration, however, taxes were raised on the upper class and guess what happened? Prosperity. It’s time to go back to the 90′s.

Posted in UncategorizedComments (0)

Tags: , , , ,

Letterman Dissed by McCain, Pailin believes in Witchcraft


Letterman Dissed by McCain, Pailin believes in Witchcraft

Jon Goldsmith

 

In the latest episode of the election sitcom, it seems that the red characters are getting more dishonest, and just flat out disturbing. John McCain was suppose to appear on David Letterman Thursday night and cancelled at the last minute. Instead of going to Washington, which was the reason he told Letterman he was unable to make the show, he went for another interview with Katie Couric. After, he didn’t rush to Washington, he went back to his hotel, had an extravagant dinner, and went to Washington the following day. The snub didn’t exactly rub Letterman the right way and he followed up his next monologue in an onslought of critcism of the deportment of the republican nominee.

Now if that weren’t everything, a video has surface on youtube in which Sarah Palin is being blessed so she will be protected from witchcraft. Can anyone say anything but wow? I knew she believed in god, and was a highly religious individual, but I never thought that she actually belonged in a different century. It’s nice to know we have someone a heartbeat away from the presidency who would have probably participated in the Salem Witch Hunts.

Even though the economy is headed down the drain, and there is no bailout deal in agreement, at least we have the republican party to cheer us up.

Posted in UncategorizedComments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sarah Palin…Yes Really


Sarah Palin…Yes Really

Gabriel Rom

The lady hasn’t been out in the political landscape for more than 24 hours and already, she’s being attacked from all sides, this site included. That of course is expected, she’s a 44 year gun-toting, anti abortion hockey mom from Alaska, but even so, the women is more dimensional than many are giving her credit for

Sarah Palin has an 80% approval rating in her home state, but like many Alaskian republicans has not been able to escape some of the corruption investigations that plagues the state’s party. Ironically, this is in part due to Palin’s relentless anti corruption crusades, taking on bigwhigs in the democratic party as well as her own.

You’re absolutely right on the cleansing that’s needed in our party, in the Republican Party.
- Sarah Palin [1]

The woman isn’t all talk though, she cannot and should not be written off just get as an empty dress (see bimbo) that was chosen just to court the evangelical and woman votes. Sarah Palin has taken on one of the most corrupt state parties in the country, she has made bitter enemies, and had to deal with (as of now) unsubstantiated corruption allegations, primarily propagated by the very people she has been trying to convict and/or oust. [2] She had to beat the incumbent republican to achieve her position, running on a moderate ticket for govenor that alienated many republicans, and additionally convinced the Lt.Gov. of Alaska Sean Parnell to jump into the GOP party to beat the incumbent.

Palin has also threatened to support democrats if GOP members wouldn’t support her tax and spend policies. Shes a shrewd, political, no-nonsense type of woman, and not the “beauty queen airhead” many have quickly pigeonholed her as.

That all being said, McCain’s VP choice is a risk, and a huge one at that. Palin does have blaringly obvious political purposes – Women, evangelicals (social conservatives), and McCain needs these votes. Barack Obama is winning this election, in the poll sna din the media, and McCain had to take a risk with his VP. But possibly unforseen by the McCain camp Palin’s pro-life anti-abortion sentiments pose a pandora’s box with voters. She may be able to bring in some hardline conservatives who were having doubts about McCain, but in the meantime she’ll also be losing a swath of liberal Hillary supporters who would have an incredibly hard time voting for a candidate who has a pro-life vp on the ticket.

What all this means for McCain, we will see in the upcoming weeks. I look forward to a Biden-Palin debate. I, and I think a good many others, have a feeling she’ll hold her own much better than the naysayers on left would wish to admit.

Posted in Election 2008, OpinionComments (10)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sarah Palin…Really?


Sarah Palin…Really?

Max Godnick

Really? Seriously John Mccain? Sarah Palin? Sarah fucking Palin? That’s what many Americans woke up to on August 28th. After weeks of speculation primarily focused on Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty and former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, America woke up to find a virtual unknown on the GOP ticket. Sarah Palin, the 44-year-old two-year governor of Alaska, found herself catapulted onto the national stage when she was chosen to be the senator’s running mate.

Now it’s clear what Mccain’s intentions were with the pick. No pundit or analyst is needed to examine why Palin will be the Vice Presidential nominee. The decision was two fold. On the one hand, Palin represents the kind of maverick change that McCain so desperately is trying to embody. A true Washington outsider, Palin brings no real political baggage into the campaign. But the real reason Mccain made this pick is because Sarah Palin is a female. Obviously trying to scrape up Hillary Clinton support, Mccain is trying to show that he is the real friend of women, he is the one “risky” enough to choose a woman whereas his opponent, in his view, sheepishly did not. McCain is hoping to convince women around the country, specifically those who are on the fence Hillary supporters, that he, not Barack Obama, has the interest of the gender in mind.

This all sounds good, and in truth, Palin was probably Mccain’s best bet. But again, to it all I must say….really?

Does McCain seriously expect Americans to buy a vice presidential debate of Biden v. Palin; The Senate’s most experienced foreign policy expert facing off against someone with virtually no experience in the area? The image is almost laughable.

Does McCain seriously expect Americans to buy that a woman who was the mayor of a 5000 person town just a mere three years ago should be placed in a position where is she is a heartbeat away from the presidency? That a woman who has never given a national speech could be the leader of the free world?

Does McCain expect Hillary supporters to mindlessly drift into the GOP column? All that is needed to thwart this drift is a speech or two by Hillary Clinton in which she proclaims her true allegiance to Barack Obama and professes that a vote for Sarah Palin is a vote against her.

Does McCain really think voters will take the Senator seriously after six months of criticizing Obama for not being experienced enough when he selects someone with essentially no experience to join him on the ticket? What does this say about McCain’s true intentions?

Yes—I think McCain really believes all this, but I don’t think Americans are going to buy it. When all the convention dust has settled, I think most Americans will see this as a mistake. Sarah Palin is not ready to lead and she will fail in her attempt to court Hillary democrats.

But hey what do I know?…McCain really could be right.

Posted in Election 2008, OpinionComments (9)

  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Comments
  • Tags

Follow Us on Twitter!

http://twitter.com/ThePurpleYouth

Archives